Change Request (issue id 2.16.840.1.113883.2.4.3.11.60.22.6.52) |
Last assignment to Giorgio Cangioli |
Issue | Cardinality/nullFlavor for address (parts) | |
---|---|---|
Id | epsos-issue-52 | |
Type | Change Request | |
Status | ![]() |
|
Priority | normal | |
![]() |
Assignment to Giorgio Cangioli (id#5) on 2013‑12‑02 13:33:24 | |
Author | assigned by Alexander Henket (id#4) | |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Author | Alexander Henket | |
Description |
In "epSOS_D3.9.1_Appendix_B1_B2_Implementation_v1.4_20110725.pdf" it would appear that addresses are overstated and suffer from some copy/paste problems. You are currently required to either state no address parts or every single mentioned address part with either a value or a nullFlavor (not stated which nullFlavor). Also every address part may appear 1..* R, including city, state, and country. This leads to fragments like: <addr use="H"> I.e. multiple types of NULL and multiple colliding address parts. What is the reason behind this? Any addr specification we have encountered in any context has said that unknown address(parts/es) should just be omitted, and with the exception of streetAddressLine no other parts should be use more than once. |