Help
Login
Busy
Search
eHDSI - Issues

 
Select object
 
false
Results (1 / 1)
Id Issue Status Priority Type Date Assigned To Label
282 Make the formCode element of the manufacturedMaterial optional Closed Normal Change Request 2018-11-19 16:15:20 Mathias Ghys
 
Change Request Make the formCode element of the manufacturedMaterial optional
Id epsos-issue-282
Status Closed
Priority Normal
Last Tracking 2018-11-19 16:15:20  by  Mathias Ghys
Current Assignee Mathias Ghys
    
Concerns
Template
false
epSOS CDA ManufacturedProduct (Medicine Content Entry Module)
/
/
Template 1.3.6.1.4.1.12559.11.10.1.3.1.3.1 (2013-12-20) epSOS CDA ManufacturedProduct
Status Retired
/
-
/
-
Events
Tracking Closed 2018-11-19 16:15:20 : Tracking by Mathias Ghys
Description
Closed the issue. We proposed the solution of making the manufacturedMaterial optional in the semantic F2F meeting of 12/13 November in Brussels, but although it would technically a solution, it was stressed that the formCode has to be mandatory for the eP/eD documents, but only optional for the PS documents.

Since this requirement cannot be fulfilled using a common template, 2 separate templates have to be created as a specialization of the current one. But this changes the specifications and has to occur through a change proposal.
This issue is a duplicate of the older one:  https://art-decor.ehdsi.eu/art-decor/decor-issues--epsos-?id=2.16.840.1.113883.3.1937.777.11.6.126  so it was decided to close this one and to keep the old one.
Assignment 2018-07-26 15:24:55 : Assigned To Mathias Ghys by Mathias Ghys
    
 TBA 
Tracking Open 2018-07-26 15:24:54 : Tracking by Mathias Ghys
    
 TBA 
Description
Finding:

- From the discussion with dr. Christof Gessner: If we look into the expand documentation, we noticed that the formCode has to have cardinality 1 .. 1 and conformance R for ePrescription and eDispensation. However, for PatientSummary, the formCode has to have cardinality 0 .. 1 and be optional. Since this template is reused in all document templates (eP, eD, PS) we should make the element optional.
This won't have any impact on the document validation, since eP/eD messages will still be valid (there is just the relaxation of the constraint)

Suggestion:

- Make the element optional.

Further explanation:

-

    
Labels
Preview Code HTML color Display Name Description
 
 TBA 
TBA TBA To be approved
To be discussed and approved
 
 M1 
M1 M1 Milestone 1
Milestone 1 – before the EXPAND-athon 9-12 December 2015 Lisbon
 
 M2 
M2 M2 Milestone 2
Milestone 2 – final results to be delived at the end of EXPAND
 
 M3 
M3 M3 Milestone 3
Milestone 3 – end of the HL7 International Project
 
 M4 
M4 M4 Milestone 4
Milestone 4 – for consideration in the future / desiderata
 
 WJ 
WJ WJ Changes Word/JIRA
Changes in the Word Specification/Open a JIRA issue
 
 TID 
TID TID Template ID
Template-ID changes throughout the specification