Your browser does not appear to support JavaScript. You may want to try one of the following:
You may want to try one of the following:
If the above does not work, try reloading the page yourself. Note that you will lose any unsaved changes:
shift
control
Show details
Hide details
This form has to be reloaded. This most likely happened because your session has expired, which might take to the login page. (If you think that you shouldn't see this message and that the problem persists, please contact support.)
- Proposal by CZ to harmonize cardinality of the section.id element across different sections in the PS CDA IG. So far, most of the section.id have cardinality 0..1 R, only following sections have cardinality 1..1 R:
eHDSIAdvanceDirective section, as the only section in the PS guidelines, has cardinality 0..* R.
I wonder if there is any specific reason why we have different rules for section.id cardinality. Link with JIRA issue: https://citnet.tech.ec.europa.eu/CITnet/jira/browse/EHEALTH-10594
- Make the cardinality of the section/id element consistent everywhere and set it to 0..1 R
-