Your browser does not appear to support JavaScript. You may want to try one of the following:
You may want to try one of the following:
If the above does not work, try reloading the page yourself. Note that you will lose any unsaved changes:
shift
control
Show details
Hide details
This form has to be reloaded. This most likely happened because your session has expired, which might take to the login page. (If you think that you shouldn't see this message and that the problem persists, please contact support.)
- According to the XML Schema definitions, the determinerCode attribute is required (this is what the validator uses for the Schema validation):
<xs:complexType name="COCT_MT230100UV01.MaterialKind"> <xs:sequence> <xs:group ref="hl7v3:InfrastructureRootElements"/> <xs:element name="code" type="hl7v3:CD" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1"/> <xs:element name="name" type="hl7v3:EN" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:attributeGroup ref="hl7v3:InfrastructureRootAttributes"/> <xs:attribute name="classCode" type="hl7v3:EntityClassMaterial" use="required"/> <xs:attribute name="determinerCode" type="hl7v3:EntityDeterminerDetermined" use="required"/> </xs:complexType>
In the CDA IGs, this attribute is specified, but set to optional.
I also had a look in the HL7 IPS CDA Implementation Guides, and there the determinerCode is not even specified, so they are also not aligned with the schema definitions.
Also the eHDSI PS Manufactured Material template must be checked.
- Add the determinerCode attribute to the pharm:generalizedMaterialKind element
-
- We are analysing wave 6 changes for eP/eD in our national implementation.
Things I read in Art-Decor, don’t match 100% with what I think were agreed on in working groups. Probably just the issue with wording, but I’d like to confirm my understanding.
There are two identifiers for medicinal products: medicinal product code (ManufacturedMaterial.code) and medicinal product package code (containerPackagedProduct.code).
Medicinal product code clearly allows national codes. Good, but we don’t have one.
It clearly does not allow PCID, but doesn’t exactly mention national package codes. (So, I would rephrase this as „package code (national or PCID blabla)“).
Package code, on the other hand, does not seem to allow national codes, but only PCID.
Our national implementation uses national package codes and we don’t have medicinal product codes. So far, the package code was sent in the manufacturedMaterial.code field. In our pursuit to be better implementers, we were planning to use it in the containerPackagedProduct.code field, but the textual explanation doesn’t really support that idea.
Would you say we should send our national package code (which is the only identifier we have for products) as the medicinal product code or package code?
- Modify descriptions